The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Coordination of a Supply Chain with Satisficing Objectives Using Contracts
|
|
Author(s): C. Shi (Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada)and B. Chen (Washington State University, USA)
Copyright: 2007
Pages: 20
Source title:
E-Supply Chain Technologies and Management
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Qingyu Zhang (Arkansas State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-255-8.ch012
Purchase
|
Abstract
Setting performance targets and managing to achieve them is fundamental to business success. As a result, it is common for managers to adopt a satisficing objective—that is, to maximize the probability of achieving some preset target profit level. This is especially true when companies are increasingly engaged in short-term relationships enabled by electronic commerce. In this chapter, our main focus is a decentralized supply chain consisting of a supplier and a retailer, both with the satisficing objective. The supply chain is examined under three types of commonly used contracts: wholesale price, buy back, and quantity flexibility contracts. Because a coordinating contract has to be Pareto optimal regardless of the bargaining powers among the agents, we first identify the Pareto-optimal contract(s) for each contractual form. Second, we identify the contractual forms that are capable of coordination of the supply chain with the satisficing objectives. In contrast to the well-known results for the supply chain with the objectives of expected profit maximization, we show that wholesale price contracts can coordinate the supply chain with the satisficing objectives, whereas buy back contracts cannot. Furthermore, quantity flexibility contracts have to degenerate into wholesale price contracts to coordinate the supply chain. This provides an important justification for the popularity of wholesale price contracts besides their simplicities and lower administration costs. Finally, we discuss possible extensions to the model by considering different types of objectives for different agents.
Related Content
|
Hamed Nozari.
© 2024.
13 pages.
|
|
Maryam Rahmaty.
© 2024.
13 pages.
|
|
Mahmonir Bayanati.
© 2024.
13 pages.
|
|
Kamalendu Pal.
© 2024.
33 pages.
|
|
Kamalendu Pal.
© 2024.
35 pages.
|
|
Aminmasoud Bakhshi Movahed, Ali Bakhshi Movahed, Hamed Nozari.
© 2024.
31 pages.
|
|
Esmael Najafi, Iman Atighi.
© 2024.
11 pages.
|
|
|