The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Enhancing Electronic Learning for Generation Y Games Geeks
|
|
Author(s): Sophie Nichol (Deakin University, Australia)and Kathy Blashki (Deakin University, Australia)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 7
Source title:
Encyclopedia of E-Collaboration
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Ned Kock (Texas A&M International University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-000-4.ch038
Purchase
|
Abstract
This article explores a purpose built learning community, or that which Bruffee (1999) refers to as “conversational community,” of University students. The community functions primarily as a collaborative learning environment, specifically for students studying games design and development at Deakin University. Specifically this article focuses on the electronic, or online learning, “Web community” of the games students. The students typically use the online environment as a supplement to face-to-face lectures and tutorials in games design and development. The games students at the centre of this article are affectionately referred to as “Games Geeks” (with their approval!), and are demographically considered, by virtue of their age, to be Generation Y (those born between 1979 and 2000). Generation Y, and the games students in particular, are collaborative learners with an increased disposition for peer learning and social relationships. Communication amongst Generation Y is continually shifting between face-to-face to online modes, and culturally specific languages such as Leet Speak (Blashki & Nichol, 2005) have evolved as part of these slippery social negotiations and hierarchies. Within the game students’ social and educative milieu, learning via traditional “transmission” forms (the hallmark of university education), is eschewed for a more collaborative and participatory method supplemented by mentor relationships and constructive conversation amongst peers. Active participation and a sense of belonging to a community of knowledgeable peers, allows students to grant authority to their peers for “constructive, reacculturative conversation” (Bruffee, 1999, p. 12) of their work and ideas. Acceptance into the community is dependant upon students being willing to submit to this authority.
Related Content
|
Prasanna Ranjith Christodoss, Rajesh Natarajan.
© 2022.
14 pages.
|
|
K. Uday Kiran, Gowtham Mamidisetti, Chandra shaker Pittala, V. Vijay, Rajeev Ratna Vallabhuni.
© 2022.
12 pages.
|
|
Amalraj Irudayasamy, Prasanna Ranjith Christotodoss, Rajesh Natarajan.
© 2022.
20 pages.
|
|
Koppula Srinivas Rao, S. Saravanan, Kasula Raghu, V. Rajesh, Pattem Sampath Kumar.
© 2022.
15 pages.
|
|
Swapna B., Arulmozhi P., Kamalahasan M., Anuradha V., Meenaakumari M., Hemasundari H., Aathilakshmi T..
© 2022.
21 pages.
|
|
Archana K. S., Sivakumar B., Siva Prasad Reddy K.V, Arul Stephen C., Vijayalakshmi A., Ebenezer Abishek B..
© 2022.
15 pages.
|
|
Swapna B., M. Kamalahasan, S. Gayathri, S. Srinidhi, H. Hemasundari, S. Sowmiya, S. Shavan Kumar.
© 2022.
12 pages.
|
|
|