Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations
Search IRMA Research
Research IRM
Open Access
IRMA Journals
IRM Books
Proceedings
Membership
The
IRMA
Community
Calls for Papers
Online Symposium
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
Electronic Commerce
Business Management
Environmental IS
Healthcare
Multimedia IS
Education
Computer Science
Public Administration
Information Systems
Library Science
Governing Social Network Knowledge Activities: Knowledge Management Governance or Knowledge Governance
View Sample PDF
Author(s):
Mohammad Reza Ghodoosi (University of Tehran, Iran)
Copyright:
2017
Pages:
16
Source title:
Managing Knowledge Resources and Records in Modern Organizations
Source Author(s)/Editor(s):
Priti Jain
(University of Botswana, Botswana)and
Nathan Mnjama
(University of Botswana, Botswana)
DOI:
10.4018/978-1-5225-1965-2.ch005
Keywords:
Business Science Reference
/
Knowledge Management
/
Library & Information Science
/
Management Science
Purchase
View
Governing Social Network Knowledge Activities: Knowledge Management Governance or Knowledge Governance
on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.
Abstract
Knowledge as an intangible asset can show flexibility and also be directed due to its context and path. The main concern of an organization's selected social network environment as a place for knowledge sharing and creation would be the suitable guidance of activities and ensuring alignment and adaption to organizational needs. Two main streams in the knowledge management domain address the concerns and give solutions: knowledge management governance (KMG) and knowledge governance (KG). Some researchers believe in the former and emphasize on managing the knowledge management programs in social network as a communication and information tool; while others believe that knowledge in social network as a virtual society (which has no strict formal relations) must be treated with flexibility and must be seen out of formal binding frameworks. In the latter, suitable policy making and engaging the right guidelines are the key points. It is obvious that no superiority can be considered for the two described streams and they may be preferred according to the mission and objectives of different social networks implemented in organizations. This chapter describes these two main streams and differentiates them according to their distinctions and similarities in the literature and available practices. The chapter gives insights to better understand the researching streams and their differences to find out the most suitable development policy for inner-organization social network knowledge management activities.
Related Content
Knowledge Management Concepts and Applications in HEIs in East Africa
. © 2023. 11 pages.
Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management in the Higher Education Context: Literature Review
. © 2023. 19 pages.
Maximize Knowledge Sharing and Learning Opportunities
. © 2023. 25 pages.
The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Global Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)
. © 2023. 14 pages.
Using Knowledge Cafés as a Vehicle for Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education Institutions
. © 2023. 26 pages.
Gap Analysis on Knowledge Management at Higher Education: Evidence From Developing and Developed Countries
. © 2023. 17 pages.
Knowledge Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions
. © 2023. 15 pages.
IRMA
Offers Over
2,500
Full Text
Open Access Research
Papers for Free Download
Click to Start Searching
Free IRM Research!
IRMA Sponsors
About Us
|
Contact
|
Sitemap
|
Legal
|
Policies
Copyright ©2024, Information Resources Management Association. 701 East Chocolate Avenue, Hershey, PA 17033.