The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Historic Times v. Sullivan and Gertz v. Welch Supreme Court Decisions and Online Social Media Libel Law
Abstract
This article re-examines two historic Supreme Court's decisions—the 1964 Times v. Sullivan and the 1974 Gertz v. Welch—as they apply to the digital era. The Court's decision in Sullivan established the federal legal guidelines for a victim to prove a libel case including actual malice. In Gertz v. Welch the Court established three categories of public figures who must prove actual malice in a libel claim. The article reviews both cases within the context of social media defamation claims. The authors conclude that the Supreme Court decisions in Times v. Sullivan and Gertz v. Welch are still relevant in the era of online communication and social media.
Related Content
|
Emre Meriç, Zindan Çakıcı.
© 2024.
23 pages.
|
|
Nemanja Milošević.
© 2024.
22 pages.
|
|
Övünç Ege.
© 2024.
13 pages.
|
|
Serkan Karatay, Başak Gezmen.
© 2024.
19 pages.
|
|
Ceren Saran.
© 2024.
31 pages.
|
|
Maria Roberta Novielli.
© 2024.
13 pages.
|
|
Hasan Gürkan, Aslı Güngör-Eral.
© 2024.
17 pages.
|
|
|