The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Mapping Human Enhancement Rhetoric
Abstract
This chapter raises ethical questions about the relationship between HET and the discourse of human enhancement technologies. Specifically, it explores some problems in mapping human enhancement rhetoric. In the first section, human enhancement rhetoric is defined. Questions are raised about the rhetorical act of re-defining “human enhancement” as a problem of self-descriptive narrative and performance measurement. In section two, various approaches and terms for mapping are presented as a way of underscoring the slippery qualities of human enhancement as a dynamic, expanding discourse. Section three explains the changing ethical positions for enhancement technology users through the concepts of “over claim,” “reacting to technology,” and “ethos.” In section four, boundary changes for HET users are discussed as a complex mapping of shifting concepts, discourse, and communities. In conclusion, the transition from human enhancement to transhuman enhancement is emphasized with suggestions for future research.
Related Content
Maja Pucelj, Matjaž Mulej, Anita Hrast.
© 2024.
29 pages.
|
Hemendra Singh.
© 2024.
26 pages.
|
Nestor Soler del Toro.
© 2024.
27 pages.
|
Pablo Banchio.
© 2024.
18 pages.
|
Jože Ruparčič.
© 2024.
26 pages.
|
Anuttama Ghose, Hartej Singh Kochher, S. M. Aamir Ali.
© 2024.
28 pages.
|
Bhupinder Singh, Komal Vig, Pushan Kumar Dutta, Christian Kaunert, Bhupendra Kumar Gautam.
© 2024.
23 pages.
|
|
|