The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Measuring Open Source Quality: A Literature Review
Abstract
There is an ample debate over the quality of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) with mixed research results. The authors show that a reason for these mixed results is that quality is being defined, measured, and evaluated differently. They report the most popular approaches including software structure measures, process measures, and maturity assessment models. The way researchers have built their samples has also contributed to the mixed results with different project properties being considered and ignored. Because FLOSS projects evolve with each release, their quality does too, and it must be measured using metrics that take into account their communities’ commitment to quality rather than just the structure of the resulting code. Challenges exist in defining what constitutes a defect or bug, and the role of modularity in affecting FLOSS quality. The authors suggest three considerations for future research on FLOSS quality models: (1) defect resolution rate, (2) kind of software product, and (3) modularity—both technical and organizational.
Related Content
|
Karl-Michael Popp.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
|
Marco Berlinguer.
© 2023.
32 pages.
|
|
Laetitia Marie Thomas, Karine Evrard-Samuel, Peter Troxler.
© 2023.
30 pages.
|
|
Renê de Souza Pinto.
© 2023.
48 pages.
|
|
Francisco Jose Monaco.
© 2023.
47 pages.
|
|
Marcelo Schmitt, Paulo Meirelles.
© 2023.
25 pages.
|
|
Hillary Nyakundi, Cesar Henrique De Souza.
© 2023.
39 pages.
|
|
|