IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Modelling Constructs

Modelling Constructs
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ekkart Kindler (Denmark’s Technical University, Denmark)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 20
Source title: Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Jorge Cardoso (SAP Research, Germany)and Wil van der Aalst (Technische Universitat Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-288-6.ch006

Purchase

View Modelling Constructs on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

There are many different notations and formalisms for modelling business processes and workflows. These notations and formalisms have been introduced with different purposes and objectives. Later, influenced by other notations, comparisons with other tools, or by standardization efforts, these notations have been extended in order to increase expressiveness and to be more competitive. This resulted in an increasing number of notations and formalisms for modelling business processes and in an increase of the different modelling constructs provided by modelling notations, which makes it difficult to compare modelling notations and to make transformations between them. One of the reasons is that, in each notation, the new concepts are introduced in a different way by extending the already existing constructs. In this chapter, the authors go the opposite direction: showing that it is possible to add most of the typical extensions on top of any existing notation or formalism—without changing the formalism itself. they introduce blocks with some additional attributes defining their initiation and termination behaviour. This serves two purposes: First, it gives a clearer understanding of the basic constructs and how they can be combined with more advanced constructs. Second, it will help combining different modelling notations with each other. Note that, though they introduce a notation for blocks in this chapter, they are not so much interested in promoting this notation here. The notation should just prove that it is possible to separate different issues of a modelling notation, and this way making its concepts clearer and the interchange of models easier. A fully-fledged block notation with a clear and simple interface to existing formalisms is yet to be developed.

Related Content

Yuvika Singh, Esha Bansal, Nisha Chanana. © 2024. 26 pages.
Nitish Kumar Minz, Anshika Prakash, Meenal Arora, Rishi Chaudhary, Saurav Dixit. © 2024. 14 pages.
Manoj Govindaraj, Chandramowleeswaran Gnanasekaran, R. Kandavel, Parvez Khan, Sinh Duc Hoang. © 2024. 20 pages.
Ravishankar Krishnan, Elantheraiyan Perumal, Manoj Govindaraj, Logasakthi Kandasamy. © 2024. 22 pages.
Sanjay Taneja, Rishi Prakash Shukla, Amandeep Singh. © 2024. 11 pages.
Mune Moğol Sever. © 2024. 23 pages.
Sujay Vikram Singh, Terrance Ancheary, Anish Mondal, Shashank Rajauria. © 2024. 17 pages.
Body Bottom