The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
An Overview of and Criteria for the Differentiation and Evaluation of RIA Architectures
|
|
Author(s): Marcel Linnenfelser (Synflag Web Engineering, Germany), Sebastian Weber (Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), Germany)and Jörg Rech (Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), Germany)
Copyright: 2010
Pages: 24
Source title:
Handbook of Research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: Technologies, Business, and Social Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): San Murugesan (Multimedia University, Malaysia & University of Western Sydney, Australia )
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-384-5.ch008
Purchase
|
Abstract
An important aspect of Web 2.0, mentioned by Tim O’Reilly, is the rich user experience. Web 2.0 applications offer the user a desktop-like interface to bring back efficiency and productivity. The click-wait-andrefresh- cycle of normal Web applications leads to a less responsive, and thus less efficient, user interface. To serve the needs of these so-called rich Internet applications (RIA), many different approaches have emerged, based either on Web standards or on proprietary approaches. This chapter aims at defining a qualified criterion system for comparing RIA platforms. Thereafter, those RIA platforms are selected and analyzed in terms of the criterion system that is most likely to become widely accepted.
Related Content
|
.
© 2020.
58 pages.
|
|
.
© 2020.
52 pages.
|
|
.
© 2020.
10 pages.
|
|
.
© 2020.
14 pages.
|
|
.
© 2020.
33 pages.
|
|
.
© 2020.
13 pages.
|
|
.
© 2020.
36 pages.
|
|
|