IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Paradox of Communities of Practice: Knowledge Sharing Between Communities

The Paradox of Communities of Practice: Knowledge Sharing Between Communities
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Donald Hislop (University of Sheffield, United Kingdom)
Copyright: 2004
Pages: 11
Source title: Knowledge Networks: Innovation Through Communities of Practice
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Paul Hildreth (Independent Knowledge Management Consultant, UK)and Chris Kimble (University of York, United Kingdom)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-200-8.ch004

Purchase

View The Paradox of Communities of Practice: Knowledge Sharing Between Communities on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter examines knowledge sharing between Communities of Practice, a relatively neglected topic of study. Theory and evidence is presented to suggest that knowledge sharing between communities is likely to be more complex than intra-community knowledge sharing, due to the lack of shared consensual knowledge or shared sense of identity which typically exists in inter-community contexts. In such situations, the development of trust is seen to be a key foundation which requires to be developed before effective knowledge sharing can occur. Three brief case studies are presented to illustrate the arguments made. Practitioner implications flowing from this chapter are twofold. Firstly, to facilitate effective inter-community knowledge sharing requires effort to be invested in developing the social relationship (and hence trust) between members from the communities. Secondly, organizations need to balance their efforts at building Communities of Practice with supporting inter-community interactions; otherwise they risk developing isolated and inward looking communities. ‘The shared infrastructure of activity that makes cooperation the norm within particular communities of activity can act as a barrier to close collaboration with outsiders’ Blackler, Crump, & McDonald, 2000, p. 282

Related Content

. © 2023. 11 pages.
. © 2023. 19 pages.
. © 2023. 25 pages.
. © 2023. 14 pages.
. © 2023. 26 pages.
. © 2023. 17 pages.
. © 2023. 15 pages.
Body Bottom