IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Recent (Dis)similarity Measures Between Histograms for Recognizing Many Classes of Plant Leaves: An Experimental Comparison

Recent (Dis)similarity Measures Between Histograms for Recognizing Many Classes of Plant Leaves: An Experimental Comparison
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Mauricio Orozco-Alzate (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, Colombia)
Copyright: 2020
Pages: 24
Source title: Pattern Recognition Applications in Engineering
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia), Maribel Anaya Vejar (Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Colombia)and Francesc Pozo (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1839-7.ch008

Purchase


Abstract

The accurate identification of plant species is crucial in botanical taxonomy as well as in related fields such as ecology and biodiversity monitoring. In spite of the recent developments in DNA-based analyses for phylogeny and systematics, visual leaf recognition is still commonly applied for species identification in botany. Histograms, along with the well-known nearest neighbor rule, are often a simple but effective option for the representation and classification of leaf images. Such an option relies on the choice of a proper dissimilarity measure to compare histograms. Two state-of-the-art measures—called weighted distribution matching (WDM) and Poisson-binomial radius (PBR)—are compared here in terms of classification performance, computational cost, and non-metric/non-Euclidean behavior. They are also compared against other classical dissimilarity measures between histograms. Even though PBR gives the best performance at the highest cost, it is not significantly better than other classical measures. Non-Euclidean/non-metric nature seems to play an important role.

Related Content

Julián Sierra-Pérez, Joham Alvarez-Montoya. © 2020. 40 pages.
Feyzan Saruhan-Ozdag, Derya Yiltas-Kaplan, Tolga Ensari. © 2020. 18 pages.
Leonardo Juan Ramirez Lopez, Gabriel Alberto Puerta Aponte. © 2020. 25 pages.
Jersson X. Leon-Medina, Maribel Anaya Vejar, Diego A. Tibaduiza. © 2020. 25 pages.
Richard Isaac Abuabara, Felipe Díaz-Sánchez, Juliana Arevalo Herrera, Isabel Amigo. © 2020. 22 pages.
Pragathi Penikalapati, A. Nagaraja Rao. © 2020. 19 pages.
Nancy E. Ochoa Guevara, Andres Esteban Puerto Lara, Nelson F. Rosas Jimenez, Wilmar Calderón Torres, Laura M. Grisales García, Ángela M. Sánchez Ramos, Omar R. Moreno Cubides. © 2020. 30 pages.
Body Bottom