The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Rethinking the Fact-Value Split: A Place for Religion in the Public Square?
Abstract
Multicultural, western societies are quite secular, and the secular-sacred divide has been shaped by the fact-value split. But, the fact-value split also influences many other cultures, including in Latin and South America and East Asia. On it, science yields knowledge, but religion and ethics yield opinions and values. Closely related is the public-private split: governments should act on public reasons (ones based on science), and not private ones (ones based on religious and ethical views). Such science is methodologically naturalistic, bracketing anything supernatural or non-physical. This science usually presupposes ontological naturalism: what exists is natural, or physical. But, the author will contend the fact-value split is mistaken; on naturalism, humans cannot have knowledge. At best, people only have interpretations, even in science. However, the author also will argue that people can have moral and religious knowledge. If so, there will be many practical implications for public policy and religious practice.
Related Content
|
Alexander Velez, Rebeca Kerstin Alonso, María Carmen Martínez-Monteagudo.
© 2024.
14 pages.
|
|
Salvador Baena Morales, Carlos Martínez-Mirambell, Mayra Urrea-Solano.
© 2024.
13 pages.
|
|
Aida Sanahuja Ribés, Odet Moliner García, Auxiliadora Sales Ciges.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
|
Magle Sanchez Castellanos.
© 2024.
15 pages.
|
|
Francisco Pradas-Esteban.
© 2024.
15 pages.
|
|
Paula Berzal-Gracia, Agustín Reyes-Torres, Alexandre Bataller-Català.
© 2024.
17 pages.
|
|
Paula González García.
© 2024.
12 pages.
|
|
|