The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Towards a Framework for Assisting Decision-Makers Assess the Potential of E-Business Models
Abstract
The electronic business landscape is confusing for many new entrants, and many of them face the paradox that hesitation would run the risk of being left behind, but rushing in and making an incorrect choice regarding e-business initiatives could have dire consequences for organisations (Wise & Morrison, 2000). E-business poses significant challenges for organisations as it affects both how organisations relate to external parties, and how they operate internally in managing activities, processes, and systems (Rayport & Jaworski, 2001). Porter (2001) argues that the companies that succeed with e-business will be those that use the Internet in conjunction with their traditional business models and activities. Osterwalder, Ben Lagha, and Pigneur (2002) and Osterwalder, Pigneur, and Tucci (2005) argue that “after an initial phase of euphoria and the following disillusionment” (in relation to e-business) it is important to understand fully how business models function. Linder and Cantrell (2000) argue that existing frameworks are not sufficient to describe the rich array of business model choices facing managers in e-business environments. In particular, decisionmakers have a difficult task in assessing the range of proposed models in order to determine those that are most suitable. The objective of this research is to develop a ‘prerequisites framework’ for assisting decision-makers assess the suitability of e-business models during the intelligence phase of the decision-making process. Following this introduction, the business model concept is discussed and the range of models proposed by researchers explored. The issue of deciding on appropriate business models is then outlined. This is followed by an explanation of the theoretical grounding for the proposed framework, and a discussion of its operationalisation as a series of Likert scales. The research concludes with thoughts on refining and testing the framework.
Related Content
|
Yu Bin, Xiao Zeyu, Dai Yinglong.
© 2024.
34 pages.
|
|
Liyin Wang, Yuting Cheng, Xueqing Fan, Anna Wang, Hansen Zhao.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
|
Tao Zhang, Zaifa Xue, Zesheng Huo.
© 2024.
32 pages.
|
|
Dharmesh Dhabliya, Vivek Veeraiah, Sukhvinder Singh Dari, Jambi Ratna Raja Kumar, Ritika Dhabliya, Sabyasachi Pramanik, Ankur Gupta.
© 2024.
22 pages.
|
|
Yi Xu.
© 2024.
37 pages.
|
|
Chunmao Jiang.
© 2024.
22 pages.
|
|
Hatice Kübra Özensel, Burak Efe.
© 2024.
23 pages.
|
|
|