IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Tracking Public Participation in Urban Governance: Democracy and Data Privacy

Tracking Public Participation in Urban Governance: Democracy and Data Privacy
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Nancy Obermeyer (Indiana State University, USA)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 18
Source title: Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Carlos Nunes Silva (University of Lisbon, Portugal)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4169-3.ch006

Purchase

View Tracking Public Participation in Urban Governance: Democracy and Data Privacy on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter examines the use of GIS, geovisualization, and other geo-locational technologies and applications, including social networking websites and mobile phones associated with Web 2.0, as a tool kit for promoting democratization or leading to loss of data privacy and freedom, focusing on the relevant historical events in 2011 and the first half of 2012. The chapter begins by presenting a brief history of the GIS and society literature, including public participation GIS, volunteered geographic information, and geoslavery. The discussion covers both the rosy view (geospatial and Web 2.0 technologies as a democratizing force) and the gloomy perspective (these same technologies as tools of control based on data capture and loss of privacy). Underlying both of these views are scale and the ability to jump scales, which are examined through the lens of Kevin Cox’s (1998) “spaces of dependence and engagement.” Having laid this groundwork, the chapter considers events in the recent past, focusing first on the Arab Spring movements in Tunisia and Egypt and the Occupy movement in the U.S. as examples of the optimistic perspective. It then proceeds to discuss data capture from smart phones and cell phones as examples of the pessimistic view. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how individuals may enhance the democratization potential of geotechnologies and Web 2.0 while minimizing data capture, loss of spatial data privacy, and the harm that these can bring.

Related Content

Kemal Yasin Göka, Halil Ibrahim Yiğit, Olcay Polat, Görkem Gülhan, Aşkıner Güngör, Soner Haldenbilen, Halim Ceylan. © 2024. 25 pages.
Hasibul Islam Lingkon, Syed Imran Ali. © 2024. 18 pages.
Metin Mutlu Aydin. © 2024. 21 pages.
Jorge Chicaiza Vaca, Markus Rabe, Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu. © 2024. 22 pages.
Aysun Aygün Oğur, Mehmet Penpecioğlu, Sezen Savran Penpecioğlu. © 2024. 21 pages.
Olcay Polat, Aşkıner Güngör, Soner Haldenbilen, Halim Ceylan. © 2024. 20 pages.
Tayfun Salihoğlu. © 2024. 26 pages.
Body Bottom