IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Unambiguous Goal Seeking Through Mathematical Modeling

Unambiguous Goal Seeking Through Mathematical Modeling
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Giusseppi Forgionne (University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA)and Stephen Russell (University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 9
Source title: Encyclopedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Frederic Adam (University College Cork, Ireland)and Patrick Humphreys (London School of Economics, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-843-7.ch100

Purchase

View Unambiguous Goal Seeking Through Mathematical Modeling on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

All decision-making support systems (DMSS) provide both input and output feedback for the user. This feedback helps the user find a problem solution and captures any created knowledge for future reference. Goal seeking is an important form of DMSS feedback that guides the user toward the problem solution. Often in the decision support literature there is a concentration on providing forward-oriented decision assistance. From this perspective, the decision problem is viewed from the problem forward, towards a solution and advice is given with that orientation. In the literature, this is most often seen in “what-if” analysis. Goal seeking takes an inverted view where a preferred or optimal solution is known and the advice provided identifies values for the decision problem variables so that the optimal or preferred solution is obtained. Goal seeking approaches can be useful not only in identifying a solution, but also examining and explaining the relationships between decision variables. Unlike what-if analysis, which is forward oriented, goal seeking starts with a preferred outcome and decision makers do not have to manipulate decision variables in a recursive manner to examine different decision scenarios.

Related Content

Yu Bin, Xiao Zeyu, Dai Yinglong. © 2024. 34 pages.
Liyin Wang, Yuting Cheng, Xueqing Fan, Anna Wang, Hansen Zhao. © 2024. 21 pages.
Tao Zhang, Zaifa Xue, Zesheng Huo. © 2024. 32 pages.
Dharmesh Dhabliya, Vivek Veeraiah, Sukhvinder Singh Dari, Jambi Ratna Raja Kumar, Ritika Dhabliya, Sabyasachi Pramanik, Ankur Gupta. © 2024. 22 pages.
Yi Xu. © 2024. 37 pages.
Chunmao Jiang. © 2024. 22 pages.
Hatice Kübra Özensel, Burak Efe. © 2024. 23 pages.
Body Bottom