The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Various Views on Digital Interactivity
|
|
Author(s): Julie Thomas (American University of Paris, France)and Claudia Roda (American University of Paris, France)
Copyright: 2006
Pages: 6
Source title:
Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Claude Ghaoui (Liverpool John Moores University, UK )
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-562-7.ch103
Purchase
|
Abstract
As Kress and Van Leeuwen (2001) state, there is no communication without interaction. Broadly, levels of “interactivity” can be recognized as depending on quality of feedback and control and exchange of discourse according to the mode or modes (“multimodal discourse”) involved. Important constraints that operate to modify interactivity of any kind can be identified as the amount of “common ground” (Clark, 1996), constraints of space and time, relative embodiment, and choice of or control over the means, manner, and/or medium of feedback. Ha and James (1998) emphasize the element of response as characterized by playfulness, choice, connectedness, information collection, and reciprocal communication.
Related Content
|
Maja Pucelj, Matjaž Mulej, Anita Hrast.
© 2024.
29 pages.
|
|
Hemendra Singh.
© 2024.
26 pages.
|
|
Nestor Soler del Toro.
© 2024.
27 pages.
|
|
Pablo Banchio.
© 2024.
18 pages.
|
|
Jože Ruparčič.
© 2024.
26 pages.
|
|
Anuttama Ghose, Hartej Singh Kochher, S. M. Aamir Ali.
© 2024.
28 pages.
|
|
Bhupinder Singh, Komal Vig, Pushan Kumar Dutta, Christian Kaunert, Bhupendra Kumar Gautam.
© 2024.
23 pages.
|
|
|