IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Integrating Scenario-Based Reasoning into a Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Emergency Management

Integrating Scenario-Based Reasoning into a Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Emergency Management
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Tina Comes (Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany), Michael Hiete (Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany), Niek Wijngaards (Thales Research & Technology Netherlands/D-CIS Lab, The Netherlands)and Frank Schultmann (Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany)
Copyright: 2010
Pages: 16
Source title: Advanced ICTs for Disaster Management and Threat Detection: Collaborative and Distributed Frameworks
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Eleana Asimakopoulou (Loughborough University, UK)and Nik Bessis (University of Bedfordshire, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-987-3.ch014

Purchase

View Integrating Scenario-Based Reasoning into a Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Emergency Management on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a technique for decision making among multiple alternatives for action providing transparent and coherent decision support for complex situations with conflicting objectives. Managing longer term decisions for environmental incidents is an application domain in which MCDA has proved useful. Yet a difficulty in applying MCDA is when uncertainties abound. Contrarily, scenario-based reasoning is a method allowing for the assessment of multiple possible future developments of the situation. In this way, the use of scenarios is a transparent and easily understandable way to integrate uncertainties into the reasoning process. We propose a mechanism to integrate scenarios. Our theoretical framework can be operationalised by decision support systems relying on both automated systems and human experts. These facilitate the assessment of consequences within a scenario, and may propose new scenarios. We illustrate this mechanism taking the decision making in emergency management after a train crash with potential release of chlorine as an example.

Related Content

Christopher Nyakotyo, Pedzisai Goronga. © 2024. 18 pages.
Colleen Halupa. © 2024. 23 pages.
Stefan Handke. © 2024. 14 pages.
Jaime Santos-Reyes, Galdino Santos-Reyes, Ricardo Tejeida-Padilla. © 2024. 19 pages.
Ahmad Kayaly. © 2024. 20 pages.
Elizabeth Stroble. © 2024. 15 pages.
Mubango Hazel, Hlanganipai Ngirande, Khathutshelo Khashane. © 2024. 20 pages.
Body Bottom