IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Quantitative Evaluation Method of Psychological Quality of College Teachers Based on Fuzzy Logic

Quantitative Evaluation Method of Psychological Quality of College Teachers Based on Fuzzy Logic
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Liangqun Yang (Neijiang Normal University, China)and Jian Li (The 29th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, China)
Copyright: 2024
Volume: 19
Issue: 1
Pages: 19
Source title: International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ghazi I. Alkhatib (The Hashemite University, Jordan (retired))
DOI: 10.4018/IJITWE.335486

Purchase

View Quantitative Evaluation Method of Psychological Quality of College Teachers Based on Fuzzy Logic on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Based on the fuzzy method, this paper establishes a ranking model of the psychological quality of college teachers and an interception model of assessment indicators. On this basis, a quantitative evaluation method of college teachers' psychological quality is proposed by using the principles of fuzzy psychological evaluation and fuzzy recognition. According to empirical study, this evaluation approach is capable of providing a theoretical foundation for the next teacher training as well as a thorough assessment of the psychological qualities of teachers. The research concludes by pointing out that the model and evaluation approach can also be used to introduce and train university teachers, and it makes some sound recommendations for their development. An empirical study on the quantitative evaluation method of college teachers' psychological quality based on fuzzy psychological evaluation and fuzzy recognition principle is beneficial to better build the foundation of college teachers' psychological quality under the concept of harmonious education.

Related Content

Ruixue Ma, Qiang Zhu. © 2024. 14 pages.
Jingyi Li, Shaowu Bao. © 2024. 15 pages.
Qingping Li, Ming Liu, Yao Zhang. © 2024. 18 pages.
Liangqun Yang, Jian Li. © 2024. 19 pages.
Nan Li. © 2024. 20 pages.
Henan Zhang, Xiangzhe Liu. © 2024. 12 pages.
Ye Aifen, Lin Shuwan, Wang Huan. © 2024. 14 pages.
Body Bottom