IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Augmenting Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis With Support Vector Machines for Improved Classifier Accuracy

Augmenting Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis With Support Vector Machines for Improved Classifier Accuracy
View Sample PDF
Author(s): C. Sathish Kumar (Bishop Heber College, India), B. Sathees Kumar (Bishop Heber College, India & Bharathidasan University, India), Gnaneswari Gnanaguru (CMR Institute of Technology, India), V. Jayalakshmi (DRBCCC Hindu College, India), S. Suman Rajest (Dhaanish Ahmed College of Engineering, India)and Biswaranjan Senapati (Parker Hannifin Corporation, USA)
Copyright: 2024
Pages: 17
Source title: Advancements in Clinical Medicine
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): P. Paramasivan (Dhaanish Ahmed College of Engineering, India), S. Suman Rajest (Dhaanish Ahmed College of Engineering, India), Karthikeyan Chinnusamy (Veritas, USA), R. Regin (SRM Instıtute of Science and Technology, India)and Ferdin Joe John Joseph (Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology, Thailand)
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5946-4.ch024

Purchase

View Augmenting Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis With Support Vector Machines for Improved Classifier Accuracy on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Mitigating chronic kidney disease poses a substantial challenge to the healthcare community. This study assesses diverse classification algorithms, encompassing NaiveBayes, multi-layer perceptron, and support vector machine. The analysis involves scrutinizing the chronic kidney disease dataset from the UCI machine learning repository. Techniques like replacing missing values, unsupervised discretization, and normalization are employed for precision enhancement. The empirical results of the classification models are evaluated for accuracy and computational time. The conclusive observation indicates that the support vector machine performs notably better than all other classification methods, with a 76% classifier accuracy which is better than classifiers such as MLP and NB. The lack of application of those feature selection methods to the dataset is a drawback of this study.

Related Content

Ramesh Chandra Aditya Komperla, Kiran Sree Pokkuluri, Varun Kumar Nomula, G. Uma Gowri, S. Suman Rajest, J. Rahila. © 2024. 16 pages.
S. S. Subashka Ramesh, Anish Jose, P. R. Samraysh, Harshavardhan Mulabagala, M. S. Minu, Varun Kumar Nomula. © 2024. 17 pages.
L. K. Hema, Rajat Kumar Dwibedi, V. Vanitha, Animesh Chandra Dey, G. R. Jothlakshmi, Sanat Kumar Dwibedi. © 2024. 12 pages.
Gnaneswari Gnanaguru, S.Silvia Priscila, M. Sakthivanitha, Sangeetha Radhakrishnan, S. Suman Rajest, Sonia Singh. © 2024. 20 pages.
C. Meenakshi, S. Meyyappan, A. Ganesh Ram, M. Vijayakarthick, N. Vinoth, Bhopendra Singh. © 2024. 14 pages.
Vithal K. Dhulkhed, N. V. Kanase, P. B. Jamale, Nagham Mahmood Aljamali. © 2024. 12 pages.
R. M. Mulla, V. M. Joshi, P. B. Patil, Kiran Kumar Thoti. © 2024. 14 pages.
Body Bottom