IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Rule of Law Index: Is It Really Impartial? A Twofold Multivariate I-Distance Approach

The Rule of Law Index: Is It Really Impartial? A Twofold Multivariate I-Distance Approach
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Milica Maricic (University of Belgrade, Serbia), Milica Bulajic (University of Belgrade, Serbia)and Milica Vasilijevic (University of Belgrade, Serbia)
Copyright: 2017
Pages: 23
Source title: Emerging Trends in the Development and Application of Composite Indicators
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Veljko Jeremic (University of Belgrade, Serbia), Zoran Radojicic (University of Belgrade, Serbia)and Marina Dobrota (University of Belgrade, Serbia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0714-7.ch009

Purchase

View The Rule of Law Index: Is It Really Impartial? A Twofold Multivariate I-Distance Approach on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The indicator-based scientific research has recently become a valuable source of information for policymakers, scholars and eventually, civil society. Many socioeconomic spheres are evaluated using composite indicators, whereas governance has not been left behind. Among several assessment measurements oriented on the rule of law and law enforcement, the Rule of Law Index devised by the World Justice Program stands out. Namely, it is a comprehensive and methodologically consistent index which measures the extent to which the countries follow the principles of the rule of law. However, the controversial question of the justification of its equal weighting scheme emerges. The presented study addresses this issue by applying the twofold I-distance approach to propose unbiased weights and an in-depth analysis of the index dynamics. Consequently, the aim of this paper is to scrutinize the Rule of Law Index and to shed light on its methodology. Furthermore, the proposed approach can serve as a foundation for future research on weighting schemes, which are enveloped with subjectivity.

Related Content

N. Geethanjali, K. M. Ashifa, Avantika Raina, Jayashree Patil, Rameshwaran Byloppilly, S. Suman Rajest. © 2024. 19 pages.
Praveen Kakada, Muhammed Shafi M. K.. © 2024. 14 pages.
P. S. Venkateswaran, Divya Marupaka, Sachin Parate, Amit Bhanushali, Latha Thammareddi, P. Paramasivan. © 2024. 15 pages.
M. Lishmah Dominic, P. S. Venkateswaran, Latha Thamma Reddi, Sandeep Rangineni, R. Regin, S. Suman Rajest. © 2024. 15 pages.
S. Sivabala, P. Vidyasri. © 2024. 23 pages.
H. Hajra, G. Jayalakshmi. © 2024. 22 pages.
Anusha Thakur. © 2024. 15 pages.
Body Bottom