IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Use of Mathematical Models in a Mechanical Metal Industry to Improve Production Planning and Control

Use of Mathematical Models in a Mechanical Metal Industry to Improve Production Planning and Control
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Leoni Pentiado Godoy (University Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil), Wagner Pietrobelli Bueno (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Brazil), Tais Pentiado Godoy (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil), Clandia Gomes (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil), Maria Carolina Martins Rodrigues (Algarve University, Portugal)and Luciana Aparecida Barbieri da Rosa (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil)
Copyright: 2021
Pages: 19
Source title: Advanced Models and Tools for Effective Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Risk Contexts
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Vicente González-Prida (University of Seville, Spain & National University of Distance Education, Spain)and María Carmen Carnero (University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3246-1.ch013

Purchase

View Use of Mathematical Models in a Mechanical Metal Industry to Improve Production Planning and Control on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter aims to propose an improvement in decision making in the planning sector and production control (PPC) with application of a mathematical model. In the methodology, the qualitative approach was used because the linguistic codifications are interpreted and characterized by a case study applying a questionnaire to the managers of the company of the metal mechanic sector. In this context, six constructs were structured as a proposal for performance improvement, being composed of costs, management, inspection, processes, and capacity. The chapter reports the main results achieved during fuzzy sets application, obtaining a better result compared to FAHP in which there were certain oscillations between the percentage of constructs. The construct prioritized by managers and specialists was the cost construct, reaching 38.60%, being advantageous for the industry when the cost is placed in order of manufacture (subconstruct), followed by the prioritized management construct with 28.50%.

Related Content

. © 2024. 36 pages.
. © 2024. 23 pages.
. © 2024. 23 pages.
. © 2024. 25 pages.
. © 2024. 21 pages.
. © 2024. 20 pages.
. © 2024. 16 pages.
Body Bottom