IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Detecting Ambiguities in Requirement Documents Written in Arabic Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Detecting Ambiguities in Requirement Documents Written in Arabic Using Machine Learning Algorithms
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ahmad Althunibat (Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Jordan), Bayan Alsawareah (Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Jordan), Siti Sarah Maidin (INTI International University, Malaysia), Belal Hawashin (Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Jordan), Iqbal Jebril (Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Jordan), Belal Zaqaibeh (Jadara University, Jordan)and Haneen A. Al-khawaja (Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Jordan)
Copyright: 2024
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
Pages: 19
Source title: International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: B. B. Gupta (Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan)
DOI: 10.4018/IJCAC.339563

Purchase

View Detecting Ambiguities in Requirement Documents Written in Arabic Using Machine Learning Algorithms on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The identification of ambiguities in Arabic requirement documents plays a crucial role in requirements engineering. This is because the quality of requirements directly impacts the overall success of software development projects. Traditionally, engineers have used manual methods to evaluate requirement quality, leading to a time-consuming and subjective process that is prone to errors. This study explores the use of machine learning algorithms to automate the assessment of requirements expressed in natural language. The study aims to compare various machine learning algorithms according to their abilities in classifying requirements written in Arabic as decision tree. The findings reveal that random forest outperformed all stemmers, achieving an accuracy of 0.95 without employing a stemmer, 0.99 with the ISRI stemmer, and 0.97 with the Arabic light stemmer. These results highlight the robustness and practicality of the random forest algorithm.

Related Content

Muath AlShaikh, Waleed Alsemaih, Sultan Alamri, Qusai Ramadan. © 2024. 19 pages.
Anna M. Segooa, Billy M. Kalema. © 2024. 27 pages.
Utsav Upadhyay, Alok Kumar, Gajanand Sharma, Ashok Kumar Saini, Varsha Arya, Akshat Gaurav, Kwok Tai Chui. © 2024. 30 pages.
Yuan Ren. © 2024. 8 pages.
Jon A. Chilingerian, Mitchell P. V. Glavin. © 2024. 27 pages.
Hadeel Al-Obaidy, Aysha Ebrahim, Ali Aljufairi, Ahmed Mero, Omar Eid. © 2024. 19 pages.
Ahmad Althunibat, Bayan Alsawareah, Siti Sarah Maidin, Belal Hawashin, Iqbal Jebril, Belal Zaqaibeh, Haneen A. Al-khawaja. © 2024. 19 pages.
Body Bottom