IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

E-Democracy Policy in Queensland

E-Democracy Policy in Queensland
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Monika Henderson (Henderson & Associates Pty Ltd, Australia), Fergus Hogarth (Associates Pty Ltd, Australia) and Dianne Jeans (Queensland Government, Australia)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 9
Source title: Electronic Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko (University of Tampere, Finland)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch213

Purchase

View E-Democracy Policy in Queensland on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The term e-democracy has tended to be used interchangeably in the literature with e-governance or e-government, and these terms have been described as “being in a constant state of definition, redefinition, and evolution” (Riley, 2002). For the purpose of this article, e-democracy is seen as one facet of a wider use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the business of government, where the focus is on increasing citizen participation in the public decision-making process rather than using ICTs to deliver government information, programs and services, to make financial transactions electronically, or to enhance government internal administrative practices such as record-keeping. E-democracy has been variously defined, described in one report as “easier to recognise than define” (Kellner, 2004). New terms have also been coined, such as m-democracy—“m” for mobile, addressing mobile communication technologies separate from electronic processes such as the Internet that are more commonly used for e-democracy (Brucher & Baumberg, 2002). The case study that follows proposes a simple definition: “E-democracy refers to the use of information and communication technologies in democratic processes.” E-democracy covers a wide range of activities that support public participation in democratic processes, including electronic voting, online consultation, Web-based discussion forums, electronic petitions to parliament, using the Internet to Webcast parliamentary debates, and digital polling and surveys. Clift (2002a) lists the leading e-democracy practices as e-mail notification as an active information dissemination tool; online public hearings and consultations; ICT use by members of parliament for electoral engagement; digital recording and availability of public hearing recordings and materials; and ICT-enabled local civic deliberations and global networking.

Related Content

Özge Önkan, Zeynep Arikan. © 2022. 36 pages.
Arun Kumar G. Hiremath, Roopa G. M., Naveen Kumar K. R.. © 2022. 23 pages.
Mangesh Manikrao Ghonge, Sulakshana Mane, Devasis Pradhan. © 2022. 25 pages.
Alaattin Parlakkılıç. © 2022. 20 pages.
Syed Abbas. © 2022. 22 pages.
Pinki Saini, Unaiza Iqbal, Mazia Ahmed, Devinder Kaur. © 2022. 24 pages.
Subhodeep Mukherjee, Venkataiah Chittipaka, Manish Mohan Baral. © 2022. 29 pages.
Body Bottom