Practical Insights Into the Group Process: What Works and What Doesn't

View Sample PDF

Author(s): Brenda J. Rogers (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, USA)and Brian Burghardt (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, USA)
Copyright: 2020
Pages: 18
Source title: Building a Patient-Centered Interprofessional Education Program
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Steven D. Waldman (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, USA)and Stephanie Bowlin (Western University of Health Sciences, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3066-5.ch003

Keywords: Education / Instructional Design / Medical Education / Medical Information Science Reference

Purchase

View Practical Insights Into the Group Process: What Works and What Doesn't on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The group process can be a highly effective and efficient method to address a problem, especially among persons with different professional backgrounds. Interprofessional collaboration can provide insight and solutions that extend beyond a single professional's knowledge. But collaboration has potential problems too, including determining how to effectively and respectfully work with people with different knowledge, experiences, and authority. This chapter reviews the benefits of group process as well as identifies the detriments of doing so and provides guidance on how to develop a successful group collaboration project.

The IRMA Community

Research IRM

Practical Insights Into the Group Process: What Works and What Doesn't

Purchase

Abstract

Related Content

IRMA Sponsors