The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
First Year Chemistry Language Support at the University of Tasmania
|
|
Author(s): Brian Francis Yates (University of Tasmania, Australia)and Michael Guy Gardiner (University of Tasmania, Australia)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 40
Source title:
Sustainable Language Support Practices in Science Education: Technologies and Solutions
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Felicia Zhang (University of Canberra, Australia), Brett Andrew Lidbury (Australian National University, Australia), Alice Marion Richardson (University of Canberra, Australia), Brian Francis Yates (University of Tasmania, Australia), Michael Guy Gardiner (University of Tasmania, Australia), Adam James Bridgeman (University of Sydney, Australia), Jurgen Schulte (University of Technology, Sydney, Australia), John Cameron Rodger (University of Newcastle, Australia)and Karen Elizabeth Mate (University of Newcastle, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-062-0.ch003
Purchase
|
Abstract
A number of in-class and post-lecture learning strategies are described that have recently been incorporated into the first year chemistry program at the University of Tasmania, Hobart. These methodologies are centered on supporting the various language based challenges that students face in achieving a firm introduction to the discipline. A number of delivery strategies were trialed for in-class activities that overcame institutional specific limitations in access to technologies in an attempt to increase student involvement in lectures and tutorials. Activities included mobile phone-based technologies (and simple overhead transparency/show-of-hand alternatives) for in-class audience surveys, word matching exercises, and chemical songs. The post-lecture approaches also covered a range of delivery platforms, including (i) on-line based quizzes that focused on providing specific, tailored feedback to allow maximal self-reflection on the understanding of key terms and concepts prior to attempting weekly summative assignments where feedback is deliberately kept limited; (ii) developing a broader range of weekly assignment questions (beyond conventional multiple choice) to focus on language issues; (iii) chemical Sudoku puzzles, and (iv) crossword activities. Evaluations of these approaches are presented.
Related Content
|
Vasanthi Reena Williams.
© 2023.
13 pages.
|
|
Kiran Vazirani, Rameesha Kalra, Sunanda Vincent Jaiwant.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
|
Amandeep Singh, Jyoti Verma, Gagandeep Kaur.
© 2023.
11 pages.
|
|
Ayodeji Ilesanmi.
© 2023.
16 pages.
|
|
Nidhi Sheoran, Nisha, Kuldeep Chaudhary.
© 2023.
23 pages.
|
|
Abin George, D. Ravindran, Monika Sirothiya, Mahendar Goli, Nisha Rajan.
© 2023.
22 pages.
|
|
Deepa Sharma.
© 2023.
16 pages.
|
|
|